Strong argument. For me, the real question is not whether every individual action is authorized. Taken literally, that would make agentic systems impossible to scale. The real issue is where firms draw the red lines on what agents are allowed to combine without review.
In enterprise settings, human oversight should not sit only at the end. It should appear at the point where a workflow turns into a sensitive judgment. Reading CRM data is fine. Combining it with market signals to rank vulnerable clients is where control should kick in.
The red line question is where governance becomes operational. One data source is routine. Two combined into a vulnerability ranking of individual clients - that's a regulated decision, whether anyone intended it or not. The agent doesn't pause at that boundary. It just takes the next logical step. The governance challenge is detecting that crossing before the output lands on someone's desk. That's the gap no one has closed yet.
Strong argument. For me, the real question is not whether every individual action is authorized. Taken literally, that would make agentic systems impossible to scale. The real issue is where firms draw the red lines on what agents are allowed to combine without review.
In enterprise settings, human oversight should not sit only at the end. It should appear at the point where a workflow turns into a sensitive judgment. Reading CRM data is fine. Combining it with market signals to rank vulnerable clients is where control should kick in.
The red line question is where governance becomes operational. One data source is routine. Two combined into a vulnerability ranking of individual clients - that's a regulated decision, whether anyone intended it or not. The agent doesn't pause at that boundary. It just takes the next logical step. The governance challenge is detecting that crossing before the output lands on someone's desk. That's the gap no one has closed yet.